PDA

View Full Version : ** andrewfaris **


pom
03-16-2003, 08:14 PM
Nice little site, fresh navigation.

http://www.andrewfaris.com/

pom :)

andew faris

oaker
03-17-2003, 02:00 AM
great site...everything you need and nothing you don't ;)

Budget Nudist
03-17-2003, 12:06 PM
clean site and nice crisp pixelfonts..the way i like them..
tight portfolio too..

damn! this pom character sure is posting sites in a row..
stay away from speed people!!

farafiro
03-17-2003, 12:27 PM
it's cool but I didn't get the aim of this site
am I the only one here or I'm in the dummies side today??

pom
03-17-2003, 12:58 PM
Don't worry, you're no dummy, it's just that you're not a Visual thinker... :D

bluegel
03-17-2003, 01:01 PM
its a nice clean site.

I didn't quite get the point of it either, but then some sites are a bit pointless.

But really liked the navigation :)

farafiro
03-17-2003, 01:47 PM
Originally posted by pom
Visual thinker... :D :mad: :eek:
so u r that :D :p

linckx
03-18-2003, 10:35 AM
like it!

reminds me alot to miniml though...

robin

akathenotorious
04-27-2003, 09:46 AM
hi everyone

has anybody the faintest idea how mr faris achieved such wonderful system of navigation.

i've been trying to do something similar myself (only vertivally, and with less submenus) for about a week now and am having very little luck.

is there a tute that could help me?
does anyone have a bit of code they wouldn't mind sharing with a relative newbie?

btw - i'm using F5 (but will be getting FMX soon - hopefully). is the fact the button's can't be instances in F5 going to hamper my ambitions?

many many thanks :D

pom
04-27-2003, 02:42 PM
Well, I guess the easiest would be to tween everything :)

akathenotorious
04-27-2003, 03:20 PM
thanks pom

i can do it using tweening and easing but his seems to be just that little bit more profesional so i'm thinking it must be AS...

i think he must be using some sort of elasticity maths to get each submenu to snap back slightly.

i'm gonna try and get a negative gravity effect (the nearer the surface the lesser the pull) to see if that will help.

thanks again :)

ForTheLoveOfGod
04-27-2003, 04:50 PM
Wasn’t feeling it, kinda dull... Also I don't think that he designed the site in consideration of people with higher resolutions such as me. I could barely read the text on his site and my resolutions is 1280 by 1024

oaker
04-27-2003, 06:06 PM
its tiny, but i can still read it ok...its your average pixel font, im on 1600 x 1200.

ForTheLoveOfGod
04-28-2003, 02:09 PM
deeeeamn I set my res to 1600 x 1200 and all the font looked like were small dots...

skee
04-28-2003, 05:07 PM
clean and not too busy...actually very stripped down...but i agree that the font is a bit difficult to read. if you have to strain to read something, i don't think it is affective.
sb