View Full Version : ** andrewfaris **
Nice little site, fresh navigation.
03-17-2003, 02:00 AM
great site...everything you need and nothing you don't ;)
03-17-2003, 12:06 PM
clean site and nice crisp pixelfonts..the way i like them..
tight portfolio too..
damn! this pom character sure is posting sites in a row..
stay away from speed people!!
03-17-2003, 12:27 PM
it's cool but I didn't get the aim of this site
am I the only one here or I'm in the dummies side today??
Don't worry, you're no dummy, it's just that you're not a Visual thinker... :D
03-17-2003, 01:01 PM
its a nice clean site.
I didn't quite get the point of it either, but then some sites are a bit pointless.
But really liked the navigation :)
03-17-2003, 01:47 PM
Originally posted by pom
Visual thinker... :D :mad: :eek:
so u r that :D :p
03-18-2003, 10:35 AM
reminds me alot to miniml though...
04-27-2003, 09:46 AM
has anybody the faintest idea how mr faris achieved such wonderful system of navigation.
i've been trying to do something similar myself (only vertivally, and with less submenus) for about a week now and am having very little luck.
is there a tute that could help me?
does anyone have a bit of code they wouldn't mind sharing with a relative newbie?
btw - i'm using F5 (but will be getting FMX soon - hopefully). is the fact the button's can't be instances in F5 going to hamper my ambitions?
many many thanks :D
Well, I guess the easiest would be to tween everything :)
04-27-2003, 03:20 PM
i can do it using tweening and easing but his seems to be just that little bit more profesional so i'm thinking it must be AS...
i think he must be using some sort of elasticity maths to get each submenu to snap back slightly.
i'm gonna try and get a negative gravity effect (the nearer the surface the lesser the pull) to see if that will help.
thanks again :)
04-27-2003, 04:50 PM
Wasn’t feeling it, kinda dull... Also I don't think that he designed the site in consideration of people with higher resolutions such as me. I could barely read the text on his site and my resolutions is 1280 by 1024
04-27-2003, 06:06 PM
its tiny, but i can still read it ok...its your average pixel font, im on 1600 x 1200.
04-28-2003, 02:09 PM
deeeeamn I set my res to 1600 x 1200 and all the font looked like were small dots...
clean and not too busy...actually very stripped down...but i agree that the font is a bit difficult to read. if you have to strain to read something, i don't think it is affective.
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.